Metadata Lock
This document introduces the metadata lock in TiDB.
Concept
TiDB uses the online asynchronous schema change algorithm to support changing metadata objects. When a transaction is executed, it obtains the corresponding metadata snapshot at the transaction start. If the metadata is changed during a transaction, to ensure data consistency, TiDB returns an Information schema is changed
error and the transaction fails to commit.
To solve the problem, TiDB v6.3.0 introduces metadata lock into the online DDL algorithm. To avoid most DML errors, TiDB coordinates the priority of DMLs and DDLs during table metadata change and makes executing DDLs wait for the DMLs with old metadata to commit.
Scenarios
The metadata lock in TiDB applies to all DDL statements, such as:
Enabling metadata lock might have some performance impact on the execution of the DDL task in TiDB. To reduce the impact, the following lists some scenarios that do not require metadata lock:
SELECT
queries with auto-commit enabled- Stale Read is enabled
- Access temporary tables
Usage
To control whether to enable metadata lock or not, you can use the system variable tidb_enable_metadata_lock
.
Impact
For DMLs, metadata lock does not block its execution, nor causes any deadlock.
When metadata lock is enabled, the information of a metadata object in a transaction is determined on the first access and does not change after that.
For DDLs, when changing metadata state, DDLs might be blocked by old transactions. The following is an example:
Session 1 Session 2 CREATE TABLE t (a INT);
INSERT INTO t VALUES(1);
BEGIN;
ALTER TABLE t ADD COLUMN b INT;
SELECT * FROM t;
(Uses the current metadata version of tablet
. Returns(a=1,b=NULL)
and locks tablet
.)ALTER TABLE t ADD COLUMN c INT;
(blocked by Session 1)At the repeatable read isolation level, from the transaction start to the timepoint of determining the metadata of a table, if a DDL that requires data changes is performed, such as adding an index, or changing column types, the DDL returns an error as follows:
Session 1 Session 2 CREATE TABLE t (a INT);
INSERT INTO t VALUES(1);
BEGIN;
ALTER TABLE t ADD INDEX idx(a);
SELECT * FROM t;
(indexidx
is not available)COMMIT;
BEGIN;
ALTER TABLE t MODIFY COLUMN a CHAR(10);
SELECT * FROM t;
(returns an errorInformation schema is changed
)
Observability
TiDB v6.3.0 introduces the mysql.tidb_mdl_view
view to help you obtain the information of the current blocked DDL.
The following takes adding an index for table t
as an example. Assume that there is a DDL statement ALTER TABLE t ADD INDEX idx(a)
:
SELECT * FROM mysql.tidb_mdl_view\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
JOB_ID: 141
DB_NAME: test
TABLE_NAME: t
QUERY: ALTER TABLE t ADD INDEX idx(a)
SESSION ID: 2199023255957
TxnStart: 08-30 16:35:41.313(435643624013955072)
SQL_DIGESTS: ["begin","select * from `t`"]
1 row in set (0.02 sec)
From the preceding output, you can see that the transaction whose SESSION ID
is 2199023255957
blocks the ADD INDEX
DDL. SQL_DIGEST
shows the SQL statements executed by this transaction, which is ["begin","select * from `t`"]
. To make the blocked DDL continue to execute, you can use the following global KILL
statement to kill the 2199023255957
transaction:
mysql> KILL 2199023255957;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
After killing the transaction, you can select the mysql.tidb_mdl_view
view again. At this time, the preceding transaction is not shown in the output, which means the DDL is not blocked.
SELECT * FROM mysql.tidb_mdl_view\G
Empty set (0.01 sec)
Principles
Description of the issue
DDL operations in TiDB are the online DDL mode. When a DDL statement is being executed, the metadata version of the defined object to be modified might go through multiple minor version changes. The online asynchronous metadata change algorithm only establishes that two adjacent minor versions are compatible, that is, operations between two versions do not break data consistency of the object that DDL changes.
When adding an index to a table, the state of the DDL statement changes as follows: None -> Delete Only, Delete Only -> Write Only, Write Only -> Write Reorg, Write Reorg -> Public.
The following commit process of transactions violates the preceding constraint:
Transaction | Version used by transaction | Latest version in the cluster | Version difference |
---|---|---|---|
txn1 | None | None | 0 |
txn2 | DeleteOnly | DeleteOnly | 0 |
txn3 | WriteOnly | WriteOnly | 0 |
txn4 | None | WriteOnly | 2 |
txn5 | WriteReorg | WriteReorg | 0 |
txn6 | WriteOnly | WriteReorg | 1 |
txn7 | Public | Public | 0 |
In the preceding table, the metadata version used when txn4
is committed is two versions different from the latest version in the cluster. This might cause data inconsistency.
Implementation details
Metadata lock can ensure that the metadata versions used by all transactions in a TiDB cluster differ by one version at most. To achieve this goal, TiDB implements the following two rules:
- When executing a DML, TiDB records metadata objects accessed by the DML in the transaction context, such as tables, views, and corresponding metadata versions. These records are cleaned up when the transaction is committed.
- When a DDL statement changes state, the latest version of metadata is pushed to all TiDB nodes. If the difference between the metadata version used by all transactions related to this state change on a TiDB node and the current metadata version is less than two, the TiDB node is considered to acquire the metadata lock of the metadata object. The next state change can only be executed after all TiDB nodes in the cluster have obtained the metadata lock of the metadata object.